|
RICHARD NASH (abt 1530 - aft 1597)(son of
David II Nash, son of Thomas Nash and Eva Scourfield,
|
![]() |
|
Sir Francis Drake
Photo credit: The Sea Dogs, Neville Williams, |
were often financed by wealthy merchants looking to secure trade routes and colonies for their developing international trade. Both adventurers and royal ships were often accompanied by merchant ships (Andrews pp.8-12). This close relation of business with the English navy must explain how our Richard Nash was a "Captain in the Portugal voyage" with Sir Francis Drake, as related by Lewys Dwnn in 1597 from information given by Richard Nash himself (II,202). We have not found Richard's name in the naval histories, but a John Nash was master of a merchant ship named the Margaret and John which participated in the great sea battle against the Spanish Armada in 1588 (Clowes I,592). This ship was listed as a London vessel owned by John Watts (later Lord Mayor of London), but the John Nash in London may have been an untraced relative of our Richard Nash. In fact, a John Nash (otherwise unidentified) signed the Carmarthen Order Book on 26 October 1581 along with our Richard Nash.
The "Portugal voyage" is sometimes taken to mean Drake's attack on Cadiz in 1587, but Nash's voyage was much more likely Drake's attempted invasion of Portugal in 1589. This was a disastrous voyage, and the article on Drake in the
Dictionary of National Biography gives a moving account of its tragic mistakes and loss of up to 16,000 seamen and soldiers.
After the defeat of the Spanish Armada in the English Channel at the end of July in 1588, fear of invasion by Spain diminished and England felt able to seek reprisals by attacking Spanish ports as well as ships bringing gold and silver from the New World. Portugal was also a target as it was effectively taken over by Spain, and the English had the additional hope that an invasion could return the exiled claimant to the throne in place of the ruler installed by King Philip of Spain. According to the
DNB,
In the following spring an expedition against the coasts of Spain and Portugal, of such magnitude that it amounted to an invasion, was placed under the joint command of Drake and Sir John Norreys. It consisted of six of the queen's capital ships, with a great many private ships of war and transports, numbering in all about 150, and carrying, what with seamen and soldiers, 23,375 men (Cal. State Papers, Dom., 8 April 1589). So far as mere numbers went, it was most formidable, but it suffered from the three terrible mistakes of being victualled with the same parsimony that had threatened to ruin the fleet the year before, of being under a divided command, and of leaving the sea, where we had proved our superiority, to fight on land, where our soldiers had but scant experience. After being detained a whole month at Plymouth by adverse winds, it was already short of provisions when it put to sea on 18 April. The first attempt was made on Corunna, where, on the 24th, the shipping was burnt and the lower town was taken arid plundered, from the upper town, however, the attack was repulsed. (DNB, p.1344)
Delays occurred and the
terrible decision was taken not to attack the port of Lisbon directly by sea or the Tagus river, but by land 45 miles north.
![]() |
|
Port of Lisbon
Photo credit: The Sea Dogs, Neville Williams, |
The long slow foot march south gave Lisbon plenty of time to prepare for attack, the foot soldiers were ill supplied and suffered disease, and the Portuguese did not arise in favor of Don Antonio's claim to the throne. The land attack upon Lisbon in late May was joined by Drake's sea attack, but the English had too little and were too late (Edwards pp.135-46). The foot soldiers had to march south to reembark on the ships again:
The soldiers, having failed in their attempt on Lisbon, came down to Cascaes and there embarked, though riot without some little loss. On the return voyage they met with very bad weather, were seventeen days before they could reach Vigo, and then in the greatest distress, their men dying fast from sickness and want. Nor could they obtain any relief at Vigo, the town having been cleared out in expectation of their coming. They vented their angry disappointment by setting it on fire, and re-embarkead. Their effective force was reduced to two thousand men, and it was agreed that Drake should fill up the complements of twenty of the best ships and take them to the Azores [to try to capture Spanish ships laden with silver and gold from the New World].... But a violent storm scattered their squadrons. The queen's ships alone held with Drake, who determined to make the best of his way to Plymouth, where he anchored in the end of June. The booty brought home was considerable, but the loss of life was appalling. Strenuous efforts were made to conceal this by misstating the numbers which originally started, and possibly exaggerating the numbers which had deserted .... The real advantage was that the vast destruction of shipping and stores put an end to all proposals of an invasion from Spain. (DNB, p.1344)
Historians still argue over the blame due Drake, Norreys, or Queen Elizabeth herself (Wernham 1-26, 194-218), but otherwise the
misconceived and disastrous voyage to Portugal is little remembered, understandably, compared to the great warmth and praise that surrounds the
great English victory against the Spanish Armada.
Our Richard
Nash survived, and probably escaped the worst rigors by staying aboard ship. We find him next signing his pedigree for Dwnn in 1597, and have no other references.
We do not know when Richard died.
Richard's wife Elizabeth Bowen must have lived as a widow in Carmarthen, or at least she paid the yearly rent on a piece of Commons land near the Castle. The note "Elizabeth Nash wyd' payeth"
was written but undated when the 1584 Carmarthen Rent Roll was
brought up to date (apparently after 1597). If she moved
to her family's home in Haverfordwest, she may be the Elizabeth Nashe who
was buried at St Mary's church on 21 December 1599 (Film no. 105104).
Richard Nash's personal life was revealed with unusual frankness in his Chancery speech about his wife. He began by explaining that he had a family and household in Carmarthen which he customarily left in his wife's care during his absences, and at the past Christmas feast he had also left a sum of money there when he had gone to London for the "defence
& presenting of certen suits dependinge in divers of the quenes majesties courts here at Westminster" and also for his study of the law while living in one of the Inns of Court, as already said. But during his absence his wife's brother, Thomas ap Bowen, had influenced his wife against him, stolen his goods and money, and "most ungodly" persuaded his wife to move to her brother's house in Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire, where Richard was not allowed even to approach her. In the following speech, he refers to himself in the third person as
"your said orator." Since the speech is a single long sentence I have broken it into paragraphs and added several commas:
One Thomas ap bowen of harfordwest in the countey pembroc, natural brothere unto the said Elizabeth your said orators wyfe, being a man overmoche enclyned to optaine and gett by unlawful means the goods & substance of other men, & to enriche himself therby.
and hoping to find a pray for his purpose in prefering the long absence of your said orator from his wyfe & famyly, hathe by sinistre & craftie meanes practised with your said orators wife to geete & obtaine into his unlawful possession all such goods, chattels, money, implements & furniture of houshold. all the said things, by the deling, as your orator supposeth, & suffrance of your said orators wyfe.
and doth not only contrary to all order of lawe geet retein kepe & withhold the same from your orator, but also hath most ungodly dissuaded your said orators wife from the company of your said orator, and doth kepe & maintein her in this --? kind of lyf in his own dwelling house.
in such sorte that he will not suffer your said orator to approch ner his wyfe without daunger of lyf, to the intent that your said orator may not seek to geet againe into his possession his said goods & chattels.
Richard repeated the charges then added his brother-in-law's threat of murder:
And doth contryve with himselfe to --? kill & dispache your said orator by some craftie means, to the end they may enjoy the said goods betwin them. (C3/133/94)
What
a sorry marital situation! We don't know
now what Richard hoped to gain by taking the matter to court, perhaps
something like a modern restraining order and court judgment against the
brother of his wife, as well as the return of his property and presumably
his wife. We know even less of the outcome, because the extant references
give only the charge and accusation, not the defense or judicial decision.
Elizabethan gentry and merchants were notoriously eager to go to court for
even trivial quarrels, so perhaps the family break was less serious than it
appeared to be. As said earlier, the widow Elizabeth Bowen Nash paid rent on
a piece of Commons near Carmarthen castle, so we can hope that they
reconciled and she returned to her husband.
Only one child of
their marriage was given in any of the pedigrees, our
Elizabeth. Richard's
reference to having a family at the time of his speech would place her birth
about 1565, according to Derek Williams' calculations. This date also fits
her marriage to Ralph Leigh
and their family of five children as listed by Lewys Dwnn
dated 1608 (II,201).
Our
Nash family and all of their spouses belonged to classic
gentry families of either English or ancient Welsh ancestry.
The Nash estate was called Great Nash in Llangwm
parish in Pembrokeshire, but the male heirs of this main Nash
line died out with the burial of Richard III Nash
(not our ancestor) in 1582. The estate of Great Nash went to
Richard's son-in-law Alban Philipps of Picton Castle
by marriage to Richard's daughter Janet, the last Great Nash
heiress. This Janet was a cousin of our Richard
Nash, who as the younger son of a younger son was never an
heir to the estate. Our Richard's wife Elizabeth Bowen also
descended from the younger son of a gentry family.
Her father Henry Bowen was never the heir of the Bowen estate
called Lochmeyler, and he lived by commerce and
civic service in the city of Haverfordwest. In this economic
respect the Nash and Bowen families paralleled the
Leighs and Oakleys in Carmarthen. For details of the Nash
and Bowen families, see the Ancestry
Chart of Richard's daughter
ELIZABETH NASH.
For me at least, it is not this gentry ancestry that makes Richard Nash especially interesting so much as his personal career.
He was one of our most historic ancestors because of the considerable documentation about him, and because of the history-making actions he participated in. He worked within the great changes during the Renaissance which were turning Britain and the European continent away from its medieval rural and local economy to the more international economy that resulted from the discovery of the New World. The year 1492 with Christopher Columbus'
first voyage to the New World seems very long ago, yet it occurred only 30 or 40 years before the birth of Richard Nash. In a small way he was on the edges of the world of sea exploration and colonization that was the first step in creating our own modern view of the earth as a single living space.
Andrews, Kenneth R. Drake's Voyages. New York: Charles Scribner's, 1967.
"Beau" Nash, Dictionary of Welsh Biography. Aberystwyth, 19??
Clowes, Wm. Laird. The Royal Navy. 5 vols. London: Sampson Low, Marston and Co., 1897. Reprint AMS Press, 1966.
Laws, Edward. The History of Little England beyond Wales: Short Pedegrees of Divers Noble-men, knights, esquires, gentlemen & Women of Pembrokeshire. Picton Castle Mss. Published 1888.
"Sir Francis Drake, Dictionary of National Biography. New York: Macmillan Co., 1908.
Wernham, R. B. "Queen Elizabeth and the Portugal Expedition of 1589", English Historical Review. LXVI (1951): 1-26, 194-218.
Williams, Derek. "An Examination of the Scourfield Pedigree", Pembrokeshire Historian, No. 6 (1994-5), pp.17-24.
Williams, Neville. The Sea Dogs: Privateers, Plunder and Piracy in the Elizabethan Age. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1.975.
By Norma Leigh Rudinsky
![]()
|
|||
|
To discuss the
genealogical and historical data, please contact
To comment on this web site or to be added to the Leigh email
list for occasional announcements, please contact
Please put Leigh in the Subject so my email program
won't think your email is spam.
© Copyright Norma
Rudinsky 1999, 2007
All Rights Reserved