|

  



PATERNAL ANCESTRY OF ?MARGARETTA PRICHARD (est 1650 –?1728)
Wife of
Oakley I Leigh.
dau of John Prichard & descendant of Welsh knights and princes
Introduction
In our Overview
of the Prichard ancestry, we briefly explain how the known pedigrees of
?MARGARETTA
PRICHARD’S paternal ancestors in Wales were traced through different branches,
and how their reliability was tested. We give these branches in toto in
the two parts of ?MARGARETTA’S ANCESTRY CHART, the
Primary Chart
and the Branch Chart, along with various possible but uncertain
ancestors who lack our desired level of reliable support. Here in this HISTORICAL NARRATIVE, we give all of those lines we consider reasonably well
supported by pedigree and historical documentation, and we present them with
their family relations shown diagrammatically in classic pedigrees. Many of
?MARGARETTA’S
ancestors were figures of great historical significance in Wales. Therefore,
this narrative also includes an account of the large role they played in Welsh
history.
We traced these
ancestors back to Welsh rulers in the 9th century, and pedigrees also
exist which claim to trace their lines back to the 4th century. Such
early times, however, are now obscure, and even the pedigrees of historically
known figures cannot be well substantiated. Their claimed marriage links to
later rulers in ?MARGARETTA’S known ancestry may be only convenient inventions,
as seen in our brief summary of these uncertain lines in the second part of the
ANCESTRY CHART titled Branch Chart. Therefore, we do not give the
earliest rulers here, yet that early history itself was crucial to later Welsh
culture and history, so we shall summarize it briefly before we take up
?MARGARETTA’S known ancestors.
DNA studies
support the view of historians that the Welsh descended from the prehistoric
inhabitants of Britain and other parts of the western seaboard of Europe
(J.Davies, p.13; National Geographic, June 2001; see also B.Cunliffe’s
Facing the Ocean, F.Pryor’s Britain BC, and D.Miles’sThe Tribes of
Britain). In the centuries after 600 B.C., the original inhabitants were
probably joined by Celts migrating from the continent and bringing to the
British Isles a language that eventually developed into Welsh and Gaelic. The
resulting mixed population can best be called Britons, and the most
striking part of their cultural synthesis appeared with Celtic visual art. This
intricate art, unlike classical pictorialism and naturalism, was characterized
by abstract design that "with its subtlety and its ambiguity, its confidence
and its tension, contains intimations of the divine and the infinite"
(J.Davies, pp.20). We are now most familiar with this quality in the famous
Celtic knot without start or end, thus easily symbolizing eternity. I.
M. Stead's description of the British Museum collection concludes that Celtic
art was one of the "outstanding abstract arts in world history" and
that the British contribution to it was "second to none"
(p.70). Archaeological finds in Wales show both imported and native forms,
especially in Anglesey by the turn of the millenium to 50 A.D. For details, see
www.walespast.com/article.shtml?id=40 and associated links.
The Celts had
reached their peak as the most powerful people in Europe around the year 300
B.C. when their territory
extended from Ireland to Anatolia. They possessed energy, talent
and pride. In some aspects of the fine arts and of technology, their
achievements were equal to those of the classical world, and the lands under
their control were potentially wealthier than those of the shores of the
Mediterranean. But they had not developed the discipline of civic society and
the ability to maintain a cohesive centralized state. Strenuous battles were
fought before the Celts yielded to more organized enemies, but yield they
did. (J.Davies p.25)
They were
eventually defeated by the legions of Rome, and Julius Caesar conquered Gaul in
present-day France in 52 B.C. The Romans in force invaded Britain nearly a
hundred years later, and the Romano-Briton period lasted for a further three and
a half centuries. In that time Latin provided an international tongue, Roman
towns were created on Roman roads (such as our ancestors’ Carmarthen and
Caerleon), and pagan Roman and Celtic religious rituals existed side by side.
Only the Britons of present-day England and Wales (named Britannia by the
Romans) shared this Roman experience, as Hadrian’s Wall kept back the Picts of
the north in present-day Scotland, and Roman legions never invaded Ireland.
The Welsh
considered themselves the true heirs of the Britons and the later Romano-Briton
cultural synthesis, and this belief became central to their consciousness for at
least the next millennium (R.R.Davies, Conquest, pp.16,78-80,434-6). They
were long sustained by pride in descent from the rulers who once controlled the
whole of England and the south of Scotland as well as present-day Wales, and who
continued to rule much of these areas for a considerable time after the Roman
legions left. Geoffrey of Monmouth in the 12th century drew the
attention of outsiders to this Welsh pride, and the Archbishop of Canterbury
remarked, “The Welsh, being sprung by unbroken succession from the original
stock of Britons, boast of all Britain as being theirs by right” (R.R.Davies,
p.79). Recent scholarship has revealed a considerable measure of
continuity in the social and institutional features of early medieval Wales from
Romano-Briton and even pre-Roman times (R.R.Davies, p.149).
A major effect
of the Romano-Briton synthesis was the establishment of Christianity from Rome
through the three stages of individual persecution or martyrdom, then acceptance
or toleration, and official establishment by mid-4th
centrury. Bishops from Britain were
present at the Councils held in Arles in 313 and Rimini in 359 (J.Davies, p.37).
Their presence at the church councils shows not only communication but
participation and recognition in the European church, so it is not surprising
that the Britons of south east Wales were considered the originators of what
came to be called the Celtic church. The school at Llantwit Major was
organized by St. Illtud and it trained Samson, who was a pioneer of Breton
monasticism, and Paul Aurelian, who was influential in Cornwall. Even
most of the leaders of early Irish monasticism were trained in Wales (J.Davies
pp.72-75). St. Patrick himself grew up in a Briton Christian community, perhaps
in the lowlands near Carlisle below Hadrian’s Wall, and he took that
Christianity with him to Ireland in 432-461 and rooted it deeply. The period
400-600 in Wales is known as the Age of the Saints, and most parishes
and many villages were given the name of a Welsh saint prefixed by “Llan”,
which means “church enclosure.” The 5th century monk David, who
became the patron saint of Wales, presided over ecclesiastical synods and was so
influential that by 1200 more than sixty churches were dedicated to him. This
religious prominence probably contributed to the lasting Welsh grief at the
coming defeats of the Britons at the hands of a new enemy.
After the
departure of the Roman army at the beginning of the 5th
century, the
Romano-Britons were prepared to replace the lost Roman power with their own rule
over their large homeland, but the vacuum was instead being filled by pagan
strangers from northern Europe, as Germanic colonists settled in the area of
present-day England, their names Angles and Saxons providing the
new words Anglo-Saxon, England, and English. Despite the Britons’
battles of resistance, soon after 500 A.D. a number of small Anglo-Saxon
kingdoms came into being in the south and east of present-day England. The years
550-650 were decisive, when the English won supremacy over most of south central
Britannia. According to the English author Michael Wood, in southern Britain by
about 600 AD Germanic culture emerged after overwhelming the native culture
(p.80). The Britons’ sense of loss and the pain of defeat by pagan strangers
were “at the root of their anguish, which would become the motive force of
much of Welsh mythology” (J.Davies p.49). Thus, Welsh history increasingly
concerned the need to resist English encroachment upon Wales and its people. As
the English expanded over the former Britannia, the Welsh were forced to
concentrate their efforts within the area of present-day Wales, and they
established the dynasties of the main kingdoms of Wales (J. Davies pp.45).
The north and
south kingdoms of Gwynedd and Deheubarth respectively are shown on our
Map, as well as the north east kingdom of Powys. Gwynedd included and had its
royal seat on the island of Anglesey. Parts of Deheubarth later acquired the
English county names Pembrokeshire, Carmarthenshire, and Cardiganshire. Kingdoms
in the south east are also shown on our MAP, but are given their later county
names of Glamorgan, Monmouthshire and Breconshire. For modern Welsh locations,
we recommend the interactive site
www.multimap.com.
In the long period from the ninth to the
thirteenth centuries, the Welsh princes reached their peak of power, as shown in
the first part of the HISTORICAL NARRATIVE, titled The Welsh
Princes, but then they were diminished and defeated. Their descendants were
no longer royal, but they became members of the powerful Welsh gentry and royal
or official administrators, and they are described in the second part of the NARRATIVE, titled The Gentry.
Home
|
Prichard Ancestry
|
Map of Wales
|
Welsh Names
Historical Narrative | Ancestry Chart | Bibliography
Welsh Princes 1 | Welsh Princes 2 | The Gentry 1 | The Gentry 2 | The Gentry 3 | The Gentry 4

To discuss the
genealogical and historical data, please contact
To comment on this web site or to be added to the Leigh email
list for occasional announcements, please contact
Please put Leigh in the Subject so my email program
won't think your email is spam.
© Copyright
Derek Williams, Norma Rudinsky
1999, 2007
All Rights Reserved
|